Intervention strategies to promote healthy and sustainable food choices among parents with lower and higher socioeconomic status | BMC Public Health

  • Tilman D, Clark M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature. 2014;515(7528):518–22.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aleksandrowicz L, Green R, Joy EJM, Smith P, Haines A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165797.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alimoradi Z, Golboni F, Griffiths MD, Broström A, Lin CY, Pakpour AH. Weight-related stigma and psychological distress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(7):2001–13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. [Cited 2021 May 26].

  • Willett. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447–92.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Song M, Fung T, Hu F, Willett W, Longo V, Chan A, et al. Association of animal and plant protein intake with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1453–63.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nelson ME, Hamm MW, Hu FB, Abrams SA, Griffin TS. Alignment of healthy dietary patterns and environmental sustainability: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(6):1005–25.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moore O, Wilkie E, Desrochers W. All in the family? Parental roles in the epidemic of childhood obesity. J Consum Res. 2016;43(5):824–59.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nicklaus S, Boggio V, Chabanet C, Issanchou S. A prospective study of food preferences in childhood. Food Qual Prefer. 2004;15(7–8):805–18.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nu CT, MacLeod P, Barthelemy J. Effects of age and gender on adolescents’ food habits and preferences. Food Qual Prefer. 1996;7:251–62.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vaughn AE, Ward DS, Fisher JO, Faith MS, Hughes SO, Kremers SPJ, et al. Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research. Nutr Rev. 2016;74(2):98–117.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yee AZH, Lwin MO, Ho SS. The influence of parental practices on child promotive and preventive food consumption behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(47):1–14.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zarnowiecki D, Ball K, Parletta N, Dollman J. Describing socioeconomic gradients in children’s diets – does the socioeconomic indicator used matter? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(44):1–12.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Giskes K, Avendaňo M, Brug J, Kunst AE. A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obes Rev. 2010;11(6):413–29.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zarnowiecki DM, Dollman J, Parletta N. Associations between predictors of children’s dietary intake and socioeconomic position: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2014;15(5):375–91.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Correia D, Severo M, Lopes C. The role of socio-economic factors in food consumption of Portuguese children and adolescents: Results from the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2015–2016. Br J Nutr. 2020;124(6):591–601.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ranjit N, Wilkinson A V., Lytle LM, Evans AE, Saxton D, Hoelscher DM. Socioeconomic inequalities in children’s diet: The role of the home food environment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):S4.

  • Chung A, Backholer K, Wong E, Palermo C, Keating C, Peeters A. Trends in child and adolescent obesity prevalence in economically advanced countries according to socioeconomic position: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2016;17(3):276–95.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beauchamp A, Backholer K, Magliano D, Peeters A. The effect of obesity prevention interventions according to socioeconomic position: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2014;15(7):541–54.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McGill R, Anwar E, Orton L, Bromley H, Lloyd-Williams F, O’Flaherty M, et al. Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact Health behavior, health promotion and society. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1–15.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(2):190–3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adams J, Mytton O, White M, Monsivais P. Why are some population interventions for diet and obesity more equitable and effective than others? The role of individual agency. PLoS Med. 2016;13(4):e1001990.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Campbell S, James EL, Stacey FG, Bowman J, Chapman K, Kelly B. A mixed-method examination of food marketing directed towards children in Australian supermarkets. Health Promot Int. 2014;29(2):267–77.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lawson GM, Hook CJ, Farah MJ. A meta-analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status and executive function performance among children. Dev Sci. 2018;21(2):10.1111/desc.12529.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frieden TR. A framework for public health action: The health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(4):590–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vos M, Deforche B, van Kerckhove A, Michels N, Poelman M, Geuens M, et al. Determinants of healthy and sustainable food choices in parents with a higher and lower socioeconomic status: A qualitative study. Appetite. 2022 Nov 1;178:106180. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195666322002719. [Cited 2022 Aug 29]

  • Khan SA, Sowards SK. It’s Not Just Dinner: Meal Delivery Kits as Food Media for Food Citizens. Front Commun (Lausanne). 2018;3:39.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fitzgerald A, Heary C, Nixon E, Kelly C. Factors influencing the food choices of Irish children and adolescents: a qualitative investigation. Health Promot Int. 2010;25(3):289–98.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gezond Leven VI. Voedingsdriehoek | Gezond Leven. 2017. Available from: https://www.gezondleven.be/themas/voeding/voedingsdriehoek. [Cited 2021 Apr 5].

  • Broers VJV, De Breucker C, Van Den Broucke S, Luminet O. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nudging to increase fruit and vegetable choice. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(5):912–20.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cecchini M, Warin L. Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Obes Rev. 2016;17(3):201–10.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hollands GJ, Carter P, Anwer S, King SE, Jebb SA, Ogilvie D, et al. Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;8(8):CD012573.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hertz FD, Halkier B. Meal box schemes a convenient way to avoid convenience food? Uses and understandings of meal box schemes among Danish consumers. Appetite. 2017;114:232–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flaherty SJ, McCarthy M, Collins A, McAuliffe F. Can existing mobile apps support healthier food purchasing behaviour? Content analysis of nutrition content, behaviour change theory and user quality integration. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(2):288–98.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Utter J, Denny S. Supporting families to cook at home and eat together: findings from a feasibility study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(10):716–22.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cabili C, Briefel R, Forrestal S, Gabor V, Chojnacki G. A cluster randomized controlled trial of a home-delivered food box on children’s diet quality in the Chickasaw nation packed promise project. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021;121(1):S59-69.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reynders T, Nicaise I, Van Damme J. De constructie van een SES-variabele voor het SiBO-onderzoek. Vol. 31, LOA-rapport. 2005.

  • Volksgezondheid F. Nutri-Score | FOD Volksgezondheid. 2019. Available from: https://www.health.belgium.be/nl/de-nutri-score-0. [Cited 2022 Feb 4].

  • Thaler R, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin Books. 2009.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Gestel LC, Kroese FM, De Ridder DTD. Nudging at the checkout counter – A longitudinal study of the effect of a food repositioning nudge on healthy food choice. Psychol Health. 2018;33(6):800–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jilcott Pitts SB, Wu Q, Sharpe PA, Rafferty AP, Elbel B, Ammerman AS, et al. Preferred healthy food nudges, food store environments, and customer dietary practices in 2 low-income Southern Communities. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(10):735–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schüz B, Meyerhof H, Hilz LK, Mata J. Equity effects of dietary nudging field experiments: systematic review. Front Public Health. 2021;23(9):668998.

  • Daniel C. Economic constraints on taste formation and the true cost of healthy eating. Soc Sci Med. 2016;148:34–41.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Egnell M, Talati Z, Galan P, Andreeva VA, Vandevijvere S, Gombaud M, et al. Objective understanding of the Nutri-score front-of-pack label by European consumers and its effect on food choices: an online experimental study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):146.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sinclair S, Hammond D, Goodman S. Sociodemographic differences in the comprehension of nutritional labels on food products. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45(6):767–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Comeos, Pieter De Vuyst, Leen Boels IP. E-commerce Belgium 2019. Available from: https://static.comeos.be/E-commerce_Belgium_2019__2.pdf. [Cited 2021 Apr 15].

  • Huyghe E, Verstraeten J, Geuens M, Van Kerckhove A. Clicks as a Healthy Alternative to Bricks: How Online Grocery Shopping Reduces Vice Purchases. J Mark Res. 2017;54(1):61–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jansen L, van Kleef E, Van Loo EJ. The use of food swaps to encourage healthier online food choices: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):1–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coughlin SS, Whitehead M, Sheats JQ, Mastromonico J, Hardy D, Smith SA. Smartphone applications for promoting healthy diet and nutrition: a literature review. Jacobs J Food Nutr. 2015;2(3):021.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Latulippe K, Hamel C, Giroux D. Social health inequalities and eHealth: a literature review with qualitative synthesis of theoretical and empirical studies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e136.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mackert M, Mabry-Flynn A, Champlin S, Donovan EE, Pounders K. Health Literacy and Health Information Technology Adoption: The Potential for a New Digital Divide. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(10):e264.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neter E, Brainin E. eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e19.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Western MJ, Armstrong MEG, Islam I, Morgan K, Jones UF, Kelson MJ. The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):1–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraser K, Love P, Campbell KJ, Ball K, Opie RS. Meal kits in the family setting: Impacts on family dynamics, nutrition, social and mental health. Appetite. 2022;169:105816.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeldman J, Mialki K, Sweeney L, Shelnutt K. O27 family mealtime behaviors among low-income African Americans participating in a healthy meal kit intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020;52(7):S13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Black AP, Brimblecombe J, Eyles H, Morris P, Vally H, Dea KO. Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Afshin A, Peñalvo JL, Del Gobbo L, Silva J, Michaelson M, O’Flaherty M, et al. The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172277.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friel S, Pescud M, Malbon E, Lee A, Carter R, Greenfield J, et al. Using systems science to understand the determinants of inequities in healthy eating. Bammann K, editor. PLoS One 2017;12(11):e0188872. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188872

  • Sawyer ADM, van Lenthe F, Kamphuis CBM, Terragni L, Roos G, Poelman MP, et al. Dynamics of the complex food environment underlying dietary intake in low-income groups: a systems map of associations extracted from a systematic umbrella literature review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):1–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-14817-y